<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Norm Gregory&#039;s World Wide Headquarters &#187; Nine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://normgregory.com/category/movies/nine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://normgregory.com</link>
	<description>The Center Of Norm Gregory&#039;s Universe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polling the Experts on Best Picture</title>
		<link>http://normgregory.com/2009/12/05/polling-the-experts-on-best-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://normgregory.com/2009/12/05/polling-the-experts-on-best-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norm Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invictus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up In The Air]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normgregory.com/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five films are in the top ten of all &#8220;Oscar experts:&#8221; &#8220;Hurt Locker,&#8221; &#8220;Invictus,&#8221; &#8220;Nine,&#8221; &#8220;Precious&#8221; and &#8220;Up In The Air.&#8221;
More experts predict Oscars&#8217; best-picture derbyFollowing up on the Oscar experts&#8217; predix we published yesterday, here&#8217;s a new batch of best-picture prophesies from a new gang of seers: Brad Brevet (RopeOfSilicon), Edward Douglas (ComingSoon.net), Scott [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Five films are in the top ten of all &#8220;Oscar experts:&#8221; &#8220;Hurt Locker,&#8221; &#8220;Invictus,&#8221; &#8220;Nine,&#8221; &#8220;Precious&#8221; and &#8220;Up In The Air.&#8221;<br />
<blockquote><span style="font-size: 140%;">More experts predict Oscars&#8217; best-picture derby</span><BR><BR>Following up on the Oscar experts&#8217; predix we published yesterday, here&#8217;s a new batch of best-picture prophesies from a new gang of seers: Brad Brevet (RopeOfSilicon), Edward Douglas (ComingSoon.net), Scott Feinberg (AndTheWinnerIs), Kevin Lewin (World Entertainment News Network), Steve Pond (TheWrap), Jeffrey Wells (Hollywood-Elsewhere). Curiously, there&#8217;s no love for &#8220;It&#8217;s Complicated&#8221; or &#8220;District 9,&#8221; but &#8220;Julie &#038; Julia,&#8221; &#8220;A Single Man&#8221; and &#8220;The Last Station&#8221; get cited here after being snubbed in the previous rundown. Again, &#8220;Up in the Air&#8221; leads the best-pic derby, but &#8220;The Hurt Locker&#8221; leaps ahead of &#8220;Precious&#8221; here for the show position.  ●  More from: <a href="http://goldderby.latimes.com/awards_goldderby/2009/12/oscars-prediction-best-picture-movie-entertainment-news.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GoldDerby+%28Gold+Derby+-+Oscar+%26+Awards+Blog%29" target="_blank">Gold Derby | Los Angeles Times</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://normgregory.com/2009/12/05/polling-the-experts-on-best-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine Review</title>
		<link>http://normgregory.com/2009/12/04/nine-review/</link>
		<comments>http://normgregory.com/2009/12/04/nine-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norm Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://normgregory.com/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First reviews I have seen of Rob Marshall&#8217;s new musical . . .
 Variety&#8217;s Analysis Of The Movie Nine&#8220;Nine&#8221; is a savvy piece of musical filmmaking. Sophisticated, sexy and stylishly decked out, Rob Marshall&#8217;s disciplined, tightly focused film impresses and amuses as it extravagantly renders the creative crisis of a middle-aged Italian director, circa 1965. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>First reviews I have seen of Rob Marshall&#8217;s new musical . . .<br />
<blockquote><span style="font-size: 140%;"> Variety&#8217;s Analysis Of The Movie Nine</span><BR><BR>&#8220;Nine&#8221; is a savvy piece of musical filmmaking. Sophisticated, sexy and stylishly decked out, Rob Marshall&#8217;s disciplined, tightly focused film impresses and amuses as it extravagantly renders the creative crisis of a middle-aged Italian director, circa 1965. Given its basis in a 27-year-old Broadway show, which itself had its unlikely origins in Federico Fellini&#8217;s self-reflective 1963 classic &#8220;8½,&#8221; the Stateside Weinstein release will probably find a more receptive audience among culture vultures than with the masses. But a robust marketing push stressing the stellar cast, strong notices and the &#8220;another &#8216;Chicago&#8217; &#8221; vibe should still generate solid returns, especially in urban areas.  ●  More from: <a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941726.html?categoryid=31&#038;cs=1" target="_blank">Read Variety&#8217;s Analysis Of The Movie Nine</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: 140%;">Nine &#8212; THR Film Review</span><BR><BR>Bottom Line: &#8220;Nine&#8221; marks the number of terrific acting and singing talents poorly used in this flat rendition of the Broadway musical.  ●  More from: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/nine-film-review-1004050932.story" target="_blank">hollywoodreporter.com</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://normgregory.com/2009/12/04/nine-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
